Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in what could end up being its most consequential abortion decision since Dobbs. In a case pitting Idaho’s extreme abortion ban against a federal law known as EMTALA—that since 1986 has required hospitals to provide emergency care—conservative justices seemed to embrace the idea that states can deny crisis medical treatment to pregnant patients, even if doing so means those patients suffer catastrophic, life-altering injuries.

Topics:  idaho s   sara rosenbaum   george washington university    will   emergency medical treatment   labor act   you ve   american   united   medicare   there s   hospitals   hattie mae campbell   holly springs   mississippi   race   that s   republican senate   democratic house   ronald   reagan   ob-gyn    nowadays   justice alito   women    see    i ve   hyde amendment   roe   pregnancy-related   pregnant    here s   supreme court   dobbs   emtala    rosenbaum    was   it s    a   wade   states   congress   medicaid   the    hospitals   texas    here   planet earth   scotus   abortion   fight   blow   revolutionary   health care law   people   language   coming   cases   baby   lot   don   decision   department   woman   federal   situations   case   understood   point   doctors   birth   emergencies   policy   stabilize   didn   resistance   communities   involved   called   delivery   happened   statute   required   arguments   crisis   requirement   early   terrible   insurance   indigent   important   stories   room   insured   long   huge   piece   accident   good   coverage   hard   includes   steeped   fetus   private   guarantees   wrong   country   incredibly   departments   rid   poor   upset   friends   means   era   brought   requires   moment   complete   racism   screen   focus   hasn   today   major   surgery   time   pretty   happening   parking   fully   understand   procedure   rightly   admission   kinds   refused   person   concerns   child   unborn   color   ban   set   lead   changed   door   oral   issue   
BING NEWS:
  • Idaho abortion case in front of SCOTUS is 'quite shocking'
    joins Jonathan Capehart to discuss the case the Supreme Court heard Wednesday on whether a federal law requiring hospitals to provide emergency medical care overrides Idaho's near-total abortion ...
    04/27/2024 - 7:51 pm | View Link
  • SCOTUS v. Pregnant Patients: Idaho’s Abortion Fight Could Blow Up a “Revolutionary” Health Care Law
    Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in what could end up being its most consequential abortion decision since Dobbs. In a case pitting Idaho’s extreme abortion ban against a federal law ...
    04/27/2024 - 6:41 am | View Link
  • Idaho's biggest hospital says emergency flights for pregnant patients up sharply
    On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments about whether Idaho's strict abortion ban ... rise in transfers of pregnant patients in crisis was "untenable." "If a woman comes to an emergency room ...
    04/26/2024 - 1:33 am | View Link
  • Supreme Court weighs Idaho abortion ban against federal emergency health care law
    The Supreme Court on April 24 weighed a potential conflict between Idaho's abortion restrictions and federal law governing emergency health care.
    04/25/2024 - 10:43 am | View Link
  • Divided Supreme Court wrestles with Idaho abortion ban and federal law for emergency care
    The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case that pits Idaho's near-total abortion ban against a federal law that requires hospitals to offer emergency care.
    04/24/2024 - 12:38 pm | View Link
  • More

 

Welcome to Wopular!

Welcome to Wopular

Wopular is an online newspaper rack, giving you a summary view of the top headlines from the top news sites.

Senh Duong (Founder)
Wopular, MWB, RottenTomatoes

Subscribe to Wopular's RSS Fan Wopular on Facebook Follow Wopular on Twitter Follow Wopular on Google Plus

MoviesWithButter : Our Sister Site

More Politics News