Kyllo | search
Click here to view Kyllo news from 60+ newspapers.
Bookmark or Share- Kyllo v. United States - Case Summary and Case BriefCase Summary of Kyllo v. United States: Federal agents used a thermal imaging device outside of Kyllo’s home, suspecting that Kyllo was growing marijuana in his home, which requires use of heat lamps.
- Kyllo v. United States | OyezBased on informants, utility bills, and the thermal imaging, a federal magistrate judge issued a warrant to search Kyllo's home. The search unveiled growing marijuana. After Kyllo was indicted on a federal drug charge, he unsuccessfully moved to suppress the evidence seized from his home and then entered a conditional guilty plea.
- Kyllo v. United States - WikipediaKyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the court ruled that the use of thermal imaging devices to monitor heat radiation in or around a person's home, even if conducted from a public vantage point, is unconstitutional without a search warrant. [1]
- KYLLO v. UNITED STATES certiorari to the united states court ...Suspicious that marijuana was being grown in petitioner Kyllo’s home in a triplex, agents used a thermal-imaging device to scan the triplex to determine if the amount of heat emanating from it was consist-ent with the high-intensity lamps typically used for indoor marijuana growth. The scan showed that Kyllo’s garage roof and a side wall
- Kyllo v. United States | 533 U.S. 27 (2001) | Justia U.S ...Based in part on the thermal imaging, a Federal Magistrate Judge issued a warrant to search Kyllo's home, where the agents found marijuana growing. After Kyllo was indicted on a federal drug charge, he unsuccessfully moved to suppress the evidence seized from his home and then entered a conditional guilty plea.
More
