Banality Of Evil | search
Click here to view Banality Of Evil news from 60+ newspapers.
Bookmark or Share- What did Hannah Arendt really mean by the banality of evil?Instead of using the Eichmann case as a way forward to advance the tradition’s understanding of radical evil, Arendt decided that his evil was banal, that is, ‘thought-defying’.
- Hannah Arendt - WikipediaShe is also remembered for the controversy surrounding the trial of Adolf Eichmann, for her attempt to explain how ordinary people become actors in totalitarian systems, which was considered by some an apologia, and for the phrase "the banality of evil."
- Eichmann in Jerusalem - WikipediaEichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil is a 1963 book by the philosopher and political thinker Hannah Arendt. Arendt, a Jew who fled Germany during Adolf Hitler's rise to power, reported on the trial of Adolf Eichmann, one of the major organizers of the Holocaust, for The New Yorker. A revised and enlarged edition was published ...
- Evil: The Crime against Humanity - Library of CongressHaving encountered such a man, Arendt saw that the banality of evil is potentially far greater in extent--indeed limitless--than the growth of evil from a "root." A root can be uprooted, which is what she meant to do when she spoke of "destroying" totalitarianism, but the evil perpetrated by an Eichmann can spread over the face of the earth ...
- Hannah Arendt On Standing Up to the Banality of EvilWhat do you make of Arendt’s banality of evil? Do you agree with Arendt’s assessment that there is nothing radical about evil — that it arises through a failure of empathetic imagination? Is critical thinking a way to protect against evil?
More
