3840x2400 | search
Click here to view 3840x2400 news from 60+ newspapers.
Bookmark or Share- Why does nobody produce a 4K 16:10 (3840x2400) desktop monitor?You don't get more pixels by going for a larger monitor. A 16:10 4K would have 3840x2400, so more than 10% extra vertical space for actual content. Another benefit of specific resolutions is the various tiling modes of the operating systems. It's pretty common to be able to snap a window to one side of the screen.
- Is 3840x2400 considered 4k? I’ve never seen such a ... - RedditYes. Slightly over, in fact. 3840x2160 is the normal one. 6. OPaque_op. • 2 yr. ago. Yes its 4k but in a 16:10 ratio. If you wanna game on this u will experience lower performance compared to 16:9 (3840x2160) as there are more pixels to be rendered exactly 3840x240 more pixels. 3. LTT-Glenwing.
- XPS-13 (9310) UHD+ or OLED 3.5k? : r/DellXPS - Reddit13.4" UHD+ (3840 x 2400) InfinityEdge Touch Anti-Reflective 500-Nit Display OR 13.4" OLED 3.5K (3456x2160) InfinityEdge Touch Anti-Reflective 400-Nit…
- Will anyone ever make a 4K 16:10 (3840x2400) monitor? : r/Monitors - RedditProbably not for a long time. 4K is already a niche monitor market segment, 16:10 narrows it down even further. Until 4K becomes much more widespread and affordable, 16:10 4K that's even harder to produce and run won't really be a thing. Other than the IBM T221 and rebadged variants of it (which is 22", has a low refresh rate, and requires ...
- Windows 11 AMOLED Version [3840x2400] - Redditblack-percentage-bot. (true) Black pixel percentage: 67.25% (6198209/9216000) beep-boop. I'm a bot. Post feedback, reports, requests or rants here. Details on the discrepancy between this and OLEDBuddy or OLEDify included.
More
