On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard arguments in United States v. Rahimi, a firearms case challenging a federal law that for three decades has prohibited people who have domestic violence restraining orders from possessing guns. Based on oral arguments, it appears likely the policy will stand. But the reasoning is complicated, and far from a clear victory for survivors or gun control. At the heart of the case is a battle between the freedom to own a firearm and the rights of domestic violence survivors to choose how they get to safety.