Comment on Investigators defend findings that controversial $2.75 million judicial contract was not a quid pro quo

Investigators defend findings that controversial $2.75 million judicial contract was not a quid pro quo

Lawmakers questioned a pair of independent investigators Tuesday about their core finding that a controversial contract awarded by the Colorado Judicial Department to a top administrator as she left her job was not explicitly given to keep the woman from speaking out about judges’ misconduct. Former U.S. Attorney Bob Troyer and former Denver independent monitor Nick Mitchell defended their conclusions during the second public meeting of the Legislative Interim Committee on Judicial Discipline, which is tasked with considering reforms to the state’s system for disciplining judges. The committee members expressed skepticism about the report’s key finding — that the contract was not designed as a payoff to silence the official, Mindy Masias, who was then chief of staff at the State Court Administrator’s Office but was facing firing over financial irregularities. “You’ve reached the conclusions you’ve reached.

 

Comment On This Story

Welcome to Wopular!

Welcome to Wopular

Wopular is an online newspaper rack, giving you a summary view of the top headlines from the top news sites.

Senh Duong (Founder)
Wopular, MWB, RottenTomatoes

Subscribe to Wopular's RSS Fan Wopular on Facebook Follow Wopular on Twitter Follow Wopular on Google Plus

MoviesWithButter : Our Sister Site

More Politics News