Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr., who took abuse for supposedly botching the oral argument in the case, pressed the ultimately successful argument that the law’s individual mandate could be considered a tax.
By JOHN M. BRODER, New York Times
Fri, 06/29/2012 - 11:47am
Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli Jr., who took abuse for supposedly botching the oral argument in the case, pressed the ultimately successful argument that the law’s individual mandate could be considered a tax.