When the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to an attorney before questioning, four dissenting justices predicted that the warning and other mandated procedures would harm the ability of police to solve crimes. One of them, Justice John Marshall Harlan, wrote that he believed the decision âentails harmful consequences for the country at largeâ and that âonly time can tell how serious those consequences might be.â Two University ... <iframe src="http://www.sltrib.com/csp/mediapool/sites/sltrib/pages/garss.csp" height="1" width="1" > </frame>